Another Step…

The United States Government controls several of the largest banks in the country, two automotive companies, and will soon initiate a coordinated seizure of the medical establishment. By the end of 2009, an estimated 40% of the American economy will be under the aegis of the Federal Government. Each of these steps is on a path that F. A. Hayek termed “The Road To Serfdom.” I recommend the interested person read the book by the same title. It is astonishing how accurate Hayek’s analysis was and equally disturbing it remains as a predictor of the results of today’s actions by Congress and the President.

The average reader of this blog may not care, or the same reader may think that central planning of automotive production, banking, and healthcare are an improvement over the current system. History teaches otherwise. And as for the people who deem themselves brilliant enough to exercise such control over individuals, I quote Adam Smith,

“The Statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals, would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted to no council and senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it.”

In other words, the current occupier of  the White House and too many members of the Legislative Branch, not to mention the Judiciary, seem to believe they can not only organize, but dictate, the manner in which an entire nation is to function down to the smallest detail. Folly and presumption are archaic terms in today’s vernacular, so allow me to be more bold. Anyone who thinks he can better administrate the activities across the spectrum of economics and social development of more than 300 million souls is a damn fool. Fools don’t bother me much as I avoid them as is practical. However, when they have the ability to tap my wallet at will, put me in jail, and force me to labor on another’s behalf, well, then I become more animated.

So to the damn fools who may read this blog (as opposed to those decent, honest, and hearty souls), let me remind you of events that took place some 235 0dd years ago. Our dear Mr. Franklin stood before the King’s Privy Council and received a dressing down like none before. You see, like the King and his Council, today’s authoritarians (that is you damn fools) in the White House and Congress feel that their unfettered power will rule for eternity. And again, remember that Mr. Franklin departed England for America where freedom as was never known before was born. Now, freedom must be born again, and there are those agitated individuals who are willing to deliver it. Those willing to rely on themselves rather than place their burdens upon another are beginning to do more than complain.

While you damn fools take another step toward tyranny and cultural suicide, there are those who will not hold hands with you on the road to ruin. They will pave their own way. After all, they don’t need you to show them how to do it. But you need them to finance yours. And in the end, the tyrant, the damn fool, doesn’t know there’s a light to turn on let alone where to find the switch. So let the last damn fool turn the lights out on this folly before it becomes the death of a nation.

Published in: on June 16, 2009 at 9:11 pm  Comments (2)  
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Just lucky… nothing more.

I’m frequently amazed by what passes for intellect. This is not a new phenomenon for me. I’ve always paused after hearing a politician, college professor, or other anointed sage after hearing or reading their take on things. Perhaps this is because I’m a blue-collar guy with a white collar education. The vast majority of people I know are not the ivory tower type. And yet, I find more wisdom in what might be called “common folk” than I do in the geniuses of record.

For example… today I read a piece in a famous newspaper, written by a professor of economics who teaches at the graduate level. This chap makes the stunning point that successful people (as measured by their incomes) are simply lucky. They’re the product of good breeding (genetics he calls it) and in a nurturing family environment (something I think is better summed up in my previous term, good breeding). Thus, successful people can make no MORAL CLAIM to their success. The subtext here is that the success wasn’t earned, but rather happened upon through simple luck of the draw. Thus, successful people are something akin to charlatans, or perhaps “posers” is the modern term.

Really? Seriously, does the chap think I’m supposed to swallow this hook line and sinker? He gives a few brilliant examples, claiming that some no-talent lip-synching boy bands make tons of money as do stupid financial managers who reap millions by risking their clients fees in sub-prime mortgage investments. Okay, valid points. Then he goes on to lament the third-world master craftsman jack of all trades who can do more than McGiver but will never make the same money as some slob of a lazy American because the master was born in the wrong place. Now I see where this is going and he drives the point home with a quaint little quote about the luckiest of the lucky, stating that they are born on third base and think they hit a triple. Finally, he claims that financial people should think of themselves as lucky to have to pay higher taxes because, you guessed it, they lucked into the privilege of paying those higher taxes to support so-called services for the less lucky. Wow, I am in awe at this logic.

Well, if you’re one of the many dozen people I know who are quite successful, you know this is too much bull for the barn. Yeah, if you’re born a goat herder in the Andes your options are slim. Unless… well… unless you have the internal realization that life does not begin and end with goat herding in the Andes. Now before you tell me I’m stretching your patience thin, I ask you to consider that success is a philosophy. If you think like a loser, you are a loser. If you think you are a prisoner of your circumstance than the bars are very strong indeed. Sound charming? It is, because there are countless examples of people who break out of their circumstances through the self-realization that things can (and dare I say, MUST) be different. They live in awful countries, have abusive parents, and maybe they can’t do advanced calculus. However, they can apply themselves to the steady and continued progress of improving their lot in life. AND there are many, many more examples, of people who simply don’t want to work that hard. They prefer excuses to effort. After all, it’s not their fault; they were just unlucky.

Perhaps the most dramatic example of my point can be made by looking at the Founding Fathers of the United States of America. These people were born into a colonial backwater. They were not the up and comers of British Society per se. Sure, George Washington had his big farm as did Thomas Jefferson and a few others. However, Ben Franklin, one of the greatest minds the world has ever know, was essentially self-taught, and had to escape his apprenticeship to his brother of all people. Old Mr. Franklin could have thrown in the towel and faced facts that he was just unlucky and doomed to be a ink smudger. He went on to become Doctor Franklin, celebrated in pre-revolutionary British society because he made himself a scholar, a scientist, and a philosoper. Likewise, George Washington, on another level entirely, could have faced his reality that his farm was at the edge of the empire and subject to the whims of the king. He could have paid his taxes (unjust as they were) and limped along in genteel style. Literally hundreds of thousands had to make the leap that life could be different than what they knew as service to the king. If that is not an intellectual leap, than I am hard pressed to find another. Within each of the Founders’ lives you’ll find stories of success through less luck and more self-reliance than the other way around. They actually embodied a nation with the philosophy that you should defy your breeding (genetics, royalty, all that nonsense) and strike out for success by creating it yourself in whatever form you fancy.

No, this may not lead to a windfall the way it did for the members of that boy band or the guy who bought the right lottery ticket. In fact, some may achieve only a modicum of financial improvement. Just the same, to claim that they are simply unlucky and doomed is to surrender before trying. And to assert that success begets obligation to those less so is to punish the very admiral qualities that produced it. The vast number of successful people in my experience have not been lucky. They have been perceptive, hard working, relentless, and tireless. The fruits of their ethic rewards them well into the future not to mention the positive effects distributed to those around them. To attribute this to randomness is intellectually dishonest if not outright balderdash.

Please, would someone check if the people who proffer such pablum have opposable thumbs. Thank you.

Published in: on April 26, 2009 at 8:53 pm  Comments (1)  
Tags: , , ,

Shredded!

In light of recent actions taken by the United States Government and words spoken by too many pundits, journalists, and outright fools, may I suggest a reading of the following document, Page 1 shown here the other three available upon request.

constitution_1_of_4_630In particular, I heard only moments ago, a person speaking with the host of a popular financial show say that people involved with the recent Tea Party protests were akin to her complaining about Nieman Marcus raising the price of her lipstick. You know, some people simply don’t get it and this lady is one of them. She thinks that your money isn’t your money. She thinks that your money should go into a common pot so that it can be spread around according to the whims of a bunch of tyrants not much better than the tin pot dictators of yore or the pseudo-marxist red shirts of today. People of this woman’s ilk hold the rest of us in complete contempt. They like to refer to us a “complainers” unwilling to “do our part.” Well, the last time I checked, millions of people in this country are doing their part, paying taxes, providing goods and services to their fellow Americans, and raising their children appropriately. However, there is a growing class of people who refuse to do this. They’re the sorry complainers of this nation, the ones who think that nothing is fair, that they shouldn’t be held responsible for any of their bad decisions, and that they should be given whatever happens to be the handout du jour. They rely on political largesse and lap it up to the tune of billions if not trillions of dollars.

The last time I read the Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence for that matter, I saw nothing about empowering the government to spread the wealth around. Thus, to the good lady mentioned above, let me respectfully ask her to keep her sticky fingers out of my wallet. An American keeps his money by right, not by privilege. Furthermore, the right to redress the government is one of the things mentioned in the Constitution and I happened to visit a few of those Tea Party rallies yesterday. Those people were universally doing just that: letting their government know they are not pleased with the direction they are taking. So if the good lady wants to mock them, go right ahead. Keep it up. Keep denying the reality that the forty percent of the people who still pay taxes in this nation are tired of giving it away to the other sixty percent. This is her idea of democracy: six men and four women are in a room, a vote is held and the resolution passes by six to four that the men can rape the women.

Just remember one thing ma’am. You don’t know how to get the job done, whatever it may be. You don’t know how to create wealth, only how to destroy it. You couldn’t run a lemonade stand on a hot July afternoon on a busy street. Before you hold the earners in contempt, I recommend you get out of that Nieman Marcus store, roll up your sleeves, and do something productive for a change. You’d be surprised the level of anger you feel after working hard, earning a few dollars, and then watching it drain away according to the edicts sent from on high in Washington.

Finally, if the good lady is offended by the previous paragraphs then it only uncovers her internal denial of her own philosophy. After all, it is she who wants to roast the golden goose to have a fine dinner tonight at the loss of all those golden eggs in the future. But boy oh boy, doesn’t that goose taste good? Too bad hers is the one being cooked.

Viva la revolution!

The Venerable 172

The Cessna 172 has been around (in one form or another) for more than 50 years. It deserves the title VENERABLE as much as any of its fellow small aircraft. I would venture a guess that more people learned to fly in this airplane than any other.

hawkflyingThat’s a handsome airplane up there, no doubt about it. It has excellent stability, decent fuel economy, and great visibility. These days, the instrument panel has changed dramatically. Slowly the “steam” gauges (or round dials you might have seen) are being replaced by multi-function displays like the one shown below.

hawkpanelThe information presented is the same, only the format has changed. This is not your grandfather’s 172. Still, flying remains the same; you have to watch your airspeed, look out for other traffic, and not forget to keep an eye on where you’re going.

These days general aviation has suffered with everyone else due to high fuel prices, increasing fees, and encroachment upon airports of housing developments. However, flying remains more than a dream for many. Stop by your local airport and you’ll see people admiring the planes, trading stories, and discussing their next trip. And well they should. If you haven’t looked at the sky and wondered what it was like to fly, check for a pulse. You might have expired without knowing it.

As always, do your checklist!

Published in: on April 15, 2009 at 1:16 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , , , , ,