The Price of Literacy

Literacy has long been a noble goal of societies around the world. However, literacy comes at a very high price. What?

That’s right, there’s a toll to be paid for literacy, one that can be an extreme burden. For example, if a citizen is ignorant, unable to read and understand the language of the law of his nation, this citizen can live with little worry about the pending doom the governing class foists upon him. He can blissfully dwell among his fellows, unaware of any number of injustices that he might otherwise protest.

Case in point is Page 16 of the current healthcare bill before the House of Representatives (of the United States that is). For all the Executive Branch bleating of how Americans will be free to choose their healthcare options (and all the reinforcement of this claim by Congress), a literate citizen need only glean the truth of Congress’ actual intentions from the aforementioned page. Should this bill become law (is there any doubt?), a citizen will not be allowed to change their plan. For example, if an employee leaves a company currently providing private coverage to work on his own, he will not be permitted to buy his own policy. Furthermore, a citizen having private coverage won’t be able to change it. Now what? Welcome to socialized medicine.

Now, an illiterate person would have nothing to worry about. He could sit back, hear his Congress and Chief Executive make promises, and have no reason to challenge them. Then, when the promises are revealed to be lies, he’ll be stuck doubting himself. Wasn’t I promised free choice? he will ask himself. Maybe not, he might conclude. After all, he couldn’t write down what he heard, nor read the printed statements should they even exist in a digitally erased world.

A literate person, on the other hand, picks up a proposed Bill, reads it, arrives at bold statements that will become the law of the land, and realizes that there is a contradiction. There is something that doesn’t mesh with what’s being said. Normally, an intrepid member of a free press would be such a person. A reporter, as they used to be called, would take in verbal statements, correlate them (or not) with the proposed legislation, and REPORT that there are serious discrepancies. A really adventurous reporter might even go so far as to ask one of the legislators to EXPLAIN the differences. Alas, this is no longer the case. Reporters have become journalists, as in they JOURNAL, they doodle their pencils at the behest of those in office. Perhaps the journalists are afraid of something. Perhaps the office holders dangle some Sword of Damocles over the heads of media members. Or, perhaps incompetence reigns in this profession.

At any rate, a literate person pays the price of his abilities. He knows that not only is the storm coming, but that the subsequent devastation will be his problem. Of course, the literate can accept this tyranny, or they can use the power of words to challenge, defy, and ultimately vanquish it. Or not. Didn’t someone once say that ignorance is bliss? They did. Nonetheless, the second half is often omitted: Bliss is short lived.

Advertisements
Published in: on July 16, 2009 at 12:26 pm  Comments (4)  
Tags: , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://bentpage.net/2009/07/16/the-price-of-literacy/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

4 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Daniel–

    Are you reading the same bill I am–HR 676? I just read page 16 several times and cannot find anything remotely related to what you are stating here–just a little bit about HMOs and then it leaps into LTC.

    Here is the bill I am looking at–
    http://www.pnhp.org/docs/nhi_bill_final1.pdf

    What the heck are you looking at?

    Joe

    • I am not familiar with the bill you mention and it seems that one is from January. See today’s Investor’s Business Daily editorial page for the correct bill.

      Thanks.

  2. Daniel–

    Thanks for taking the time to look–I am pretty sure I found the right bill at

    http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/20090714_HOUSE_HEALTH.pdf

    OK–I am assuming this is the right one (gotta trust the NY Times–LOL). I still don’t see how you infer what you say in your blog from what is on P.16 or anywhere near it. Grandfathered health care is defined, and the next few pages place limits on issuers (insurance companies)–how does this keep someone from getting insurance after they leave a plan? My understanding is that this bill improves their ability to access other government approved plans, versus the enormous premiums they would have to pay under current rules.

    When my daughter graduated from college, I attempted to pick up the benefits she was guaranteed under COBRA–and the cost was outrageous. This bill would seem to make more affordable options available, such as the insurance she now carries courtesy of her enrollment at Penn.

    It does not, to me, appear to be such a bad bill–as long as you are not in the group that is paying extra taxes to facilitate it. Medicare is on its last legs, and, while I don’t have to worry (too much) about where my HI is coming from in retirement, there are many others who soon will if this bill (or something similar) is not passed.

    Joe

    • Joe,

      It does not appear to be bad bill, you say, “so long as you are not in the group that is paying extra taxes to facilitate it.” Hmmm…. And, “Medicare is on its last legs.” Doesn’t the fact that Medicare is on its last legs (your term) kind of give a hint of things to come with the next government program, i.e. the new so-called healthcare bill?


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: